In relaying these two opposing opinions to you, I am allowing
myself some editorial licence Om/cf, by stating formerly that I,
in large part, disagree with the anti-war stance and agree in
large part with the pro-war stance.
Anti-Opinion: Dated 2 Dec 2001 (Sunday Express, Tabloid U.K.)
(Former Express war reporter in Afghanistan, Yvonne Ridley)
Title: Why I have to speak out against war.
...I am not a political person, nor am I a member of any
pressure group, and I am not anti-war. I am a reporter, not a
commentator and I do not usually address personal opinions.
However, I do have a story to tell and I have decided to tell it
to anyone who will listen. On November 18, I gave my "peace"
message to between 80,000 and 100,000 people who, like me, are
against this war. Although my knees were trembling, I relayed my
story about Kama Village (subjected to U.S. bombing). The Yvonne
Ridley I used to know would not have dared, or cared, to address
such a meeting.
There is a huge tide turning against this war and it has the
authorities worried. This was illustrated by the London
Metropolitan Police's statement which said 15,000 turned up at
Trafalgar Square when it was plain to see that there were at
least four times as many. They say truth is the first casualty
of war and it's now lying in intensive care.
I don't know how long my "15 minutes of fame" will last but I
intend to make use of every second to highlight the injustices
of this war and the humanitatian disaster. I cannot stand
shoulder to shoulder with George W Bush and Tony Bliar. I am
not "with" Osama Bin Laden.
The life of one innocent Afgahn is as important as the life of
one innocent American but that is not the message we are hearing
from our "friends" over the Atlantic. I still feel a gut-
wrenching ache for the people of New York and Washington - but
revenge on this scale is not the answer. The only way to deal
with terrorism is to strangle it financially, then launch an
underground war, as in Northern Ireland. I wonder how people
would have reacted if we had dropped daisy cutter bombs on the
American-funded offices and training camps (IRA) that have
existed in Northern Ireland for 30 years.
I have always been passionate about life but now I do lie awake
at night thinking about the pain being inflicted on the Afgahn
people in the hunt for one man. This is not justice - it's
bloody criminal.
[If upon reading U.K.Voices thinks that he has at last succeeded
in his attempt at brainwashing U.K.Citizen, he would be quite
mistaken.]
The above reporter, in my opinion, recklessly ventured into
extremely hostile territory and was duly captured by enemy
forces, immediately putting her life and those with her at risk.
Her nationality gave her sufficient bargining power to hasten
her release, I doubt the eventual fate of the 2 Afghan guides
she took with her was as pleasant. One can only imagine what
that might have been. To add further embarrasment to her nation,
her mother pleaded before the national media, to implore that
the Taliban release her daughter (of course quite
understandably). However, on news of Ms.Ridley's release, and
for the proceeding couple of days, the reporters's mother, in so
many words, thanked the Taliban and stated for all the world to
hear, what 'nice' people she thought the Taliban were. The same
group of people who left to their own devices, put womens'
rights, right at the bottom of their list of priorities, if it
was ever on there. Ms.Ridley having been present at this rally
seemed to contradict herself on the numbers present at it. She
said..
Police Est 15,000 persons, and she multiplied that by at least
4. Hmmmm...That makes at least the minimum 60,000...not 80-
100,000. The truth sure is the first casualty of
war...Ms.Ridley.
Pro-Opinion: Dated Dec 2 2001 (Sunday Express, Tabloid U.K)
(Former Labour MP, Robert Kilroy-Silk)
Title: Taliban are not worthy of Mercy.
Why all the fuss about a few Taliban fighters killed in the Kala-
i-Janghi fortress? What's Amnesty International getting into a
lather for? The fighters weren't in Afghanistan to visit the
sights or grow poppies, were they? They're terrorists. Their
friends murdered innocent men and women in America on September
11 and they gloated over the deaths.
And, by all accounts, the terrorists began the fighting when
they beat and bit to death the CIA officer, Mike Spann - after
one of them exploded a grenade to kill himself and several of
his guards - after which they used their weapons on their
captors. What were the Alliance forces and the Americans
expected to do?
We all know Taliban troops cannot be trusted. We've seen them
change sides faster than a traffic goes from red to green. For
the past couple of months, they have played out a saga of
betrayal and deceit, showing themselves to be turncoats who will
fight against friends at the wave of a dollar, or a fist. They
would barter their mothers for a Toyota pick-up.
Why should those guarding them have their safety put at risk
once the fanatics had started the killing? After all, they keep
telling the whole world what fierce fighters they are, how they
will fight to the death and become martyrs on the way to
paradise.
Who would want to take risks with gun-waving head bangers like
these? Mind you, it was, so far, the only time they have stood
their ground and fought.
Remember how we were warned by the faint hearts that this would
be a war that the U.S. could not win? How we were told that the
well-fed comfortable Western soldiers would be no match for the
ideoligically driven hard men? Do you recall how frequently the
so-called lessons of history were cited and how we were made to
believe the Americans would get bogged down in the snow, lost in
the mountains and would return home in body bags?
Some prediction that was. Oh, the Taliban posed as great
warriors but the moment they were confronted by Alliance forces,
being properly directed by Americans supported by precision
bombing, they either caved in, surrendered, changed sides or
fled. Some heroes they are.
They are fine when it comes to beating, intimidating and
terrorising women. They can do that, all right. They're also
good at blowing up unsuspecting and unarmed men and women going
about their daily business. But they are not up to fighting real
soldiers. One lot, the Pakistanis, got themselves airlifted out
of harm's way by the Pakistani airforce.
Doesn't say a lot for their principles, does it? They evaporate
pretty quickly, don't they? They can be bought, bartered or just
forgotten when they become inconvenient or too dangerous to live
by.
This war is being won by the Americans - in the air and on the
ground. They must be sure to dictate the peace. Afghanistan must
be built on American principles, reflecting civilsed values. It
must not be left to the squabbling crew meeting in Bonn.
-------
Om/cf, speaking as an U.S. citizen what is your opinion on the
contents of the 2 posts, the prior one containing that news
report, but also specifically the last paragraph above?